Evolution and Ecology of Drug Resistance

Figure 1: Relative transmission of drug-resistant strains of M. tuberculosis compared to drug-susceptible strains (adapted from Borrell et al. IJTLD 2009).

What is the Origin of Drug Resistance?

One of the most important questions in the epidemiology of drug-resistant TB is whether the global burden of drug resistance is primarily due to the de novo acquisition of resistance during patient treatment or a consequence of transmission of already drug-resistant strains.

Heterogenity in Transmission

Traditionally, the thought was that drug resistance in bacteria was universally associated with a reduction in virulence and/or transmissibility. However, when reviewing the current evidence for the transmissibility of drug-resistant Mtb, we found that multidrug-resistant strains of Mtb were everything from 10 times less- to 10 times more transmissible than drug-susceptible strains (Figure 1).

Compensatory Mutations

The reason for this heterogeneity is partially because the molecular basis of drug resistance in Mtb is complex, and different drug resistance-conferring mutations are associated with different effects on strain fitness. Moreover, by using a combination of experimental evolution, molecular epidemiology and comparative genome sequencing of clinical strains, we identified compensatory mutations in the RNA polymerase which mitigate some of the negative effects associated with rifampicin resistance in Mtb (Figure 2).

These compensatory mutations were associated with increased fitness in vitro and were overrepresented in regions with high burden of multidrug-resistant TB, illustrating some of the bacterial factors that could lead to the observed heterogeneity in transmission of drug-resistant Mtb.

Figure 2: Compensatory mutations in the RNA polymerase of rifampicin-resistant Mtb (adapted from Comas et al. Nat Genet 2012).

Walker T.M et al. A cluster of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis among patients arriving in Europe from the Horn of Africa: a molecular epidemiological study. Lancet. 2018(in press). DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30004-5

Cretton S et al. A new antifungal and antiprotozoal bibenzyl derivative from Gavilea lutea. Nat Prod Res. 2018;32(6):695-701. DOI: 10.1080/14786419.2017.1338287

Nguyen T.T.N, Schindler C, Dien T.M, Probst-Hensch N, Perez L, Künzli N. Acute effects of ambient air pollution on lower respiratory infections in Hanoi children: an eight-year time series study. Environ Int. 2018;110:139-148. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2017.10.024

Müller-Rompa S.E.K et al. An approach to the asthma-protective farm effect by geocoding: good farms and better farms. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2018(in press). DOI: 10.1111/pai.12861

Maia M.F et al. Attractive toxic sugar baits for controlling mosquitoes: a qualitative study in Bagamoyo, Tanzania. Malar J. 2018;17(1):22. DOI: 10.1186/s12936-018-2171-2

Späth A, Zemp E, Merten S, Dratva J. Baby-friendly hospital designation has a sustained impact on continued breastfeeding. Matern Child Nutr. 2018;14(1). DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12497

Wiedemar N et al. Beyond immune escape: a variant surface glycoprotein causes suramin resistance in Trypanosoma brucei. Mol Microbiol. 2018;107(1):57-67. DOI: 10.1111/mmi.13854

Jäger F.N, Bechir M, Harouna M, Moto D.D, Utzinger J. Challenges and opportunities for healthcare workers in a rural district of Chad. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:7. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2799-6

Arku R.E et al. Elevated blood pressure and household solid fuel use in premenopausal women: analysis of 12 Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) from 10 countries. Environ Res. 2018;160:499-505. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.026

Cole-Hunter T et al. Estimated effects of air pollution and space-time-activity on cardiopulmonary outcomes in healthy adults: a repeated measures study. Environ Int. 2018;111:247-259. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2017.11.024