Group | Data Evidence Evaluation and Policy

We have developed intuitive graphics to visualise the importance of several factors on the effects of interventions.

Obtaining and Acting on the Best Available Evidence

Decision-making should be informed by the best available evidence in order to effectively improve health. Only the evidence that reaches a decision point by managers and policy makers can actually be acted upon eventually leading to better health.

In the Data-Evaluation-Evidence-Policy (DEEP) group at Swiss TPH we work across the whole spectrum of ‘knowledge translation:’ from the production of primary data, to informing and evaluation policies, to research synthesis and guidance development. Specific activities include:

  • Designing and testing innovative interventions to improve paper-based information systems.
  • Assessing the quality of programmatic data of vaccination programs (Gavi Alliance) and of malaria, tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS grants (Global Fund).
  • Analysing microdata from household surveys to understand vaccination coverage rates and their determinants.
  • Conducting scoping, framework and systematic reviews on topics related to vaccination, neglected tropical diseases and health systems.
  • Promoting and facilitating guidance development initiatives to translate evidence into recommendations.

Reaching the Most Vulnerable

Swiss TPH focuses on the most vulnerable groups to make real improvements for people and communities. Within our current mandates, we therefore try to identify opportunities to reshape the work for those most in need. In the area of vaccination and tuberculosis, for example, we produced evidence on factors associated to children not being at all vaccinated, on inequities in vaccination, and on tuberculosis treatment delays.

“We define health systems guidance as systematically developed statements produced at global or national levels to assist decisions about appropriate options for addressing a health systems challenge in a range of settings and to assist with the implementation of these options and their monitoring and evaluation.”

Xavier Bosch-Capblanch

Through the Swiss Centre for International Health (SCIH), a department of Swiss TPH, we offer clients a broad range of consultancy and project implementation services in global health. In terms of better evidence for better decisions, our activities range from data production and evidence generation to policy formulation.

1. Data Production

2. Evidence Generation

3. Policy Formulation

Innovating Paper-Based Tools - PHISICC

Communities with the least access to health care services are typically living in the most remote, rural areas. In these areas, paper continues to be the basis of health information systems. Swiss Center for International Health works with partners to design and test innovative paper-based tools to improve decision making and quality of care. In the frame of the Paper Based Health Information System in Child Care project (PHISICC), we work with partners focusing on the most remote health facilities where the most vulnerable populations in Ivory Coast, Mozambique and, Nigeria can be reached. The paper based innovative tools will facilitate frontline health workers in making informed clinical and public health decisions.
For more information: www.phisicc.org

Link to Project

Communicate to Vaccinate - COMMVAC

In the frame of the Communicate to Vaccinate project (COMMVAC), we have produced global and local evidence on communication interventions to im-prove vaccination coverage. By supporting the World Health Organisation (WHO) in translating this evidence into guidance, we aim at contributing to improving vaccination uptake, especially by in remote communities that have least access to vaccination services.
For more information: www.commvac.com.

Link to Project

Key Achievements

Kaufman J et al. Childhood vaccination communication outcomes unpacked and organised in a taxonomy to facilitate core outcome establishment. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;84:173-184. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.02.007

Oku A et al. Factors affecting the implementation of childhood vaccination communication strategies in Nigeria: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:200. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4020-6mplementation of childhood vaccination communication strategies in Nigeria: a qualitative st

Bosch-Capblanch X, Zuske M.K, Auer C. Research on subgroups is not research on equity attributes: evidence from an overview of systematic reviews on vaccination. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16:95. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-017-0587-x

Kaufman J et al. The comprehensive 'Communicate to Vaccinate' taxonomy of communication interventions for childhood vaccination in routine and campaign contexts. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:423. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4320-x

Muloliwa A.M et al. Using the COMMVAC taxonomy to map vaccination communication interventions in Mozambique. Glob Health Action. 2017;10(1):1321313. DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1321313